Learning in Evolving Ecologies: rethinking the relations between Humans, Nature and Technology
Parole chiave:
co-evolutionary pedagogy; hybrid ecologies; transformative learningAbstract
This contribution outlines a co-evolutionary pedagogical perspective by clarifying the foundations of an ecological approach to learning. Drawing on Bronfenbrenner’s (1977) bioecological model, learning is interpreted as the outcome of a multilayered system in which individuals, natural environments and technological mediators continuously interact. The theoretical-critical investigation within this framework explores the potential of hybrid learning ecologies, understood as learning environments that integrate sensory immersion in nature, collaborative environmental engagement, and reflective technological mediation, to foster ecological understanding and transformative competencies. Drawing on a critical synthesis of the scientific literature, the study contends that understanding how ecological relationships shape learning processes is essential for reimagining education in an era of sweeping environmental and technological change. The analysis highlights how such hybrid ecologies can promote perspective shifts, embodied awareness and systemic thinking, thereby strengthening learners’ ability to recognise interdependencies and to act within complex socio-ecological contexts. From this perspective, nature emerges as an active agent in the development of ecological sensitivity, while “slow” and intentional technologies function as reflective mediators without replacing direct environmental experience. The co-adaptive process between learners, tools and environments ultimately provides a conceptual basis for designing educational practices oriented toward sustainability and relational literacy.
Keywords: co-evolutionary pedagogy; hybrid ecologies; transformative learning
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abrahamson, D., & Mechsner, F. (2022). Toward synergizing educational research and movement sciences: Learning as developing perception for action. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1813-1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09668-3
AlAfnan, M. A., & MohdZuki, S. F. (2025). Applying AlAfnan taxonomy to English composition courses: Structuring learning outcomes for effective teaching. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 269–285.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Berglund, A. (2024). Design of a co-evolutionary approach for sustainable educational ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 14th Design Thinking Research Symposium.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development, pp. 793–828). Wiley.
Burns, H. (2011). Teaching for transformation: (Re)designing sustainability courses based on ecological principles. Journal of Sustainability Education http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/9389.
de Laat, M., Ryberg, T., Dohn, N. B., Børsen Hansen, S., & Hansen, J. J. (Eds.). (2020). Networked Learning 2020: Proceedings for the Twelfth International Conference on Networked Learning (Networked Learning Conference No. 12). Aalborg: Institut for Kommunikation og Psykologi, Aalborg Universitet.
Fataar, A., & Norodien-Fataar, N. (2021). Towards an e-learning ecologies approach to pedagogy in a post-COVID world. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), (84), 155-168 https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i84a08.
Forsler, I., Bardone, E., & Forsman, M. (2024). The future postdigital classroom. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00488-y
Gomez Paloma, F. (2017). Embodied cognition: Theories and applications in education science. Nova Science Publishers.
Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Dohn, N. B. (2014, April). Design for networked learning: framing relations between participants' activities and the physical setting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning (Vol. 9, pp. 137-144). https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v9.8980.
Gourlay, L., Rodríguez-Illera, J. L., Barberà, E., Bali, M., Gachago, D., Pallitt, N., Jones, C. R., Bayne, S., Hansen, S. B., Hrastinski, S., Jaldemark, J., Themelis, C., Pischetola, M., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Matthews, A., Gulson, K. N., Lee, K., Bligh, B., Thibaut, P., Vermeulen, M., Knox, J. (2021). Networked learning in 2021: A community definition. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 326–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00222-y
Gulikers, J. T. M., Khaled, A., Visscher, K., & Visscher-Voerman, I. (2025). Transdisciplinary learning environments that stimulate co-creation and co-learning between students and external partners: An empirical exploration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1768. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06079-x
Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., & Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative Pedagogies of the Future: An Evidence-Based Selection. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00113
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Ionescu, T., & Vasc, D. (2014). Embodied cognition. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.156
Jandrić, P., & Ford, D. R. (Eds.). (2022). Postdigital Ecopedagogies: Genealogies, Contradictions, and Possible Futures. Springer. https:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97262-2
Johnson, G. M., & Puplampu, K. P. (2008). Internet use and the techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(1).https://doi.org/10.21432/T2CP4T
Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002
Lacković, N., Olteanu, A., & Campbell, C. (2024). Postdigital literacies in everyday life and pedagogic practices. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 796–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00500-5
Lebert, A., & Vilarroya, Ó. (2024). The links between experiential learning and 4E cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1541(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15238
McLay, K. F., & Reyes, V. C. (2019). Identity and digital equity: Reflections on a university educational technology course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4364
Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 114–128). Routledge.
Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2023). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19338–19354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
Provincia Autonoma di Trento. (2022). Sulle tracce della natura – Percorsi educativi per una cittadinanza ecologica. Dipartimento Istruzione Natura 2000 - Provincia autonoma di Trento
Raab, M., & Araújo, D. (2019). Embodied cognition with and without mental representations: The case of embodied choices in sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01825
Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138-159.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0.
Redman, A., & Wiek, A. (2021). Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 785163. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.785163.
Regione Emilia-Romagna. (2021). Rete regionale delle scuole che promuovono salute. https://salute.regione.emilia-romagna.it.
Ruano, J. C. (2017). Educación y desarrollo sostenible: la creatividad de la naturaleza para innovar en la formación humana. Educación y Educadores, 20(2), 229-248.https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2017.20.2.4.
Rustamova, R. P. (2023). Important features of the formation of ecological culture in students. Journal of Economics and Business Management, 6(4), 67–74.
Sangrà, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Guitert-Catasús, M. (2019). Learning ecologies through a lens: Ontological, methodological and applicative issues. A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1619–1638. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12795
Schlüter, M., Hertz, T., Klein, A., & Wijermans, N. (2025). Disentangling the entangled in productive ways: Modelling social–ecological systems from a process-relational perspective. Sustainability Science, 20(3), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01648-0
Shafi, A. (2020). The impact of the secure custodial setting on re-engaging incarcerated children with education and learning – A case study in the UK. International Journal of Educational Development, 76, Article 102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102190
Sinnema, C., Meyer, F., Le Fevre, D., Chalmers, H., & Robinson, V. (2023). Educational leaders’ problem-solving for educational improvement: Belief validity testing in conversations. Journal of Educational Change, 24(2), 133–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09437-z
Spencer, M. B. (2024). Contributions to inclusive and impactful development and psychopathology science: Interrogating ecology-linked vulnerability and resilience opportunities. Development and Psychopathology, 36(5), 2075–2090. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000579
Sung, H., & Nathan, M. J. (2025). Unraveling temporally entangled multimodal interactions: investigating verbal and nonverbal contributions to collaborative construction of embodied math knowledge. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 8.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00504-6
Sung, S., Thomas, D., & Rikakis, T. (2024). Enacting transdisciplinary values for a postdigital world: The Challenge-Based Reflective Learning (CBRL) framework. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00485-1
Tyrrell, J., & Shalavin, C. (2023). Learning foams: Towards an atmospheric ethics of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00418-4
Van Kraalingen, I. (2021). A systematized review of the use of mobile technology in outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.1984963.
Van Kraalingen, I. (2022). Theorizing technological mediation in the outdoor classroom. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3), 754–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00315-2.
Van Niekerk, M. P., & Schmidt, L. (2016). The ecology of distance learning: Bridging the gap between university and student. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-5-663.
Vargas Roncancio, I., Temper, L., Sterlin, J., Smolyar, N. L., Sellers, S., Moore, M., Melgar-Melgar, R., Larson, J., Horner, C., Erickson, J. D., Egler, M., Brown, P. G., Boulot, E., Beigi, T., & Babcock, M. (2019). From the Anthropocene to mutual thriving: An agenda for higher education in the Ecozoic. Sustainability, 11(12), Article 3312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123312
Vossoughi, S., Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2023). Toward just and sustainable futures: Human learning and relationality within socio-ecological systems. Review of Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X231223505
Webb, J., Raez-Villanueva, S., Carrière, P. D., Beauchamp, A.-A., Bell, I., Day, A., Elton, S., Feagan, M., Giacinti, J., Kabemba Lukusa, J. P., Kingsbury, C., Torres-Slimming, P. A., Bunch, M., Clow, K., Gislason, M. K., Parkes, M. W., Parmley, E. J., Poland, B., & Vaillancourt, C. (2023). Transformative learning for a sustainable and healthy future through ecosystem approaches to health: Insights from 15 years of co-designed ecohealth teaching and learning experiences. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(1), e86–e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00305-9
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Paolo Creati, Claudia Maulini, Antonio Cuccaro, Filippo Gomez Paloma
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
