Fruitful hybridisations and formative assessment: an integrated model to enhance learning in schools
Parole chiave:
fruitful hybridisations, formative assessment, school inclusion, inclusive teacherAbstract
The concept of fruitful hybridisation constitutes an epistemological paradigm capable of reconciling technological and pedagogical innovation, redefining assessment processes according to the principles of greater equity, significance, and educational value. Assessment conceived as ‘fruitful hybridisation’ represents an innovative pedagogical perspective that recognizes the essential need to integrate different approaches, tools, methodologies, and assessment contexts. This vision aims to overcome rigid and linear models, promoting assessment processes characterized by adaptive flexibility in response to the complexity of learning pathways and the diverse cognitive, relational needs of students. This study aims to analyse the empirical results of a survey conducted on course participants who completed the specialisation course for support teaching at the University of Catania. The analysis of the data obtained through the administration of a structured questionnaire QAPD (Trinchero, Piacenza, 2022) provides substantial insights into the assessment dynamics that characterize educational contexts, demonstrating how fruitful hybridisation is an effective construct for addressing complex assessment challenges. The processing and interpretation of the collected data allow us to trace a multidimensional profile of assessment practices, offering concrete operational guidelines for responding effectively to school inclusiveness.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Amemasor, S.K., Caviglia, F., Mark, D., & Thomas, A. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practice. In Frontiers in Education, Sec. Teacher Education Vol. 10 article, no 1541031 https://doi.org/10.3 3 89/feduc.2025.1541031
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). New York: Freeman.
Black, P. & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. In Educa-tional assessment, evaluation and accountability, vol 21 n.1, pp.5-31.
Bonaiuti, G., & Dipace, A. (2021). Teaching and learning in the classroom and online. For effective blended learning. Rome: Carocci Faber.
Bray-Clark, N. & Bates, R. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs and teacher effectiveness. Implications for professionals’ development. In the Professional Educator, vol.26, num 1, pp.13-22.
D’Alonzo, L. & Monauni, A. (Eds.) (2021). What is differentiated instruction? Towards an inclusive and innovative school. Brescia: Scholé
Di Pace, A. (2019). Digital skills, new learning environments and teaching profes-sionalism. In Cipriani G. & Cagnolati A., (eds.), Humanities between research and teaching. Proceedings of the International Conference, Vol II, pp. 405-418. Cornaredo (Mi): Il Castello Edizioni.
Fabbri, L. (2007). Reflexivity and training. Educational thinking between experience and re-search. Rome: Carocci Editore
Iavarone, M.L. (ed.). (2022). Educating in times of change. Educational sustainability in transitions between fragility and opportunity. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Li, J., & Gu, P. (2024). Formative assessment for self-regulated learning: Evidence from a teacher intervention study. SSRN Electronic Jour-nal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656391
Lindvall, J., Ryve, A., & Johansson, M. (2025). A critical review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effect of teachers’ participation in professional development on teaching practices and student outcomes, in Teaching and Teacher Education, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101482
Mangione, G.R.J., Kopp, E. & AA.VV. (2025). Changes and trajectories in teach-ing professionalism. In Mangione, G.R.J. & Kopp, E., (eds.), Teachers’ Education on the Move. Special Issue, Journal of e-learning and knowledge, Vol 21, No. 1, pp. 15–34.
Marzano, A. (2021). Designing, experimenting, and evaluating in educational research. Lecce: PensaMultimedia
Montalbetti, G. (2005). Competency-based educational planning. Milan: Guerini e Asso-ciati
Mulè, P., & Gulisano, D. (eds.). (2024). Teachers between educational innovation and in-clusive processes. Rome: Studium Edizioni
Piacenza, S. & Trinchero, R. (2022). Inside the school. A survey on teaching and evaluation practices and on the training needs of teachers. Form@re Open Journal for online training, 22 (2) pp.1-18.
Ricciardi, M. (2021). Generative teaching-learning environments, enhanced by dig-ital technologies, for the development of guidance skills and talent training. In Profession-alità Studi, Vol. 4 n.3 pp.106-129,
Spadafora, G. (2022). Empirical-experimental educational research and teacher professionalism to improve inclusive schooling. In Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psy-chological Studies, vol. 26, pp. 269–284.
Striano, M. (2001). Transformative learning and reflexivity. Milan: FrancoAngeli
Trinchero, R. (2015). JsStat https://www.edurete.org/jsstat/jsstat.htm.
Trinchero, R. (2020). Educational research manual. Methodology, tools, techniques. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Tschannen-Moran M., Woolfolk Hoy A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elu-sive construct. In Teaching Teacher Education, Vol 17, pp. 783–805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Viganò, R.M. (2025). Educational research and teaching professionalism: methodologies, cul-tures, and perspectives of mediation. In Methods for researching school practices to promote learning. Proceedings of the SIRD conference, Trieste 2025 (pp.1-14). Trieste: EUT Edizioni
William, D. & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: practical techniques for K-12 classrooms. West Palm Beach, Florida: Learning Science International
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. An Overview. In Theory into practice, vol.41, No 2, pp.64-70 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Luisa Boninelli

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.