Ecologies of knowledge and the drifts of learning: a pedagogical reading between organism, technique and insti-tution

Autori

  • Sabrina Lucilla Barone Università telematica Pegaso

Parole chiave:

cognizione ecologica, mediazione tecnica, istituzioni educative

Abstract

This study explores the evolution of university pedagogical models in response to the transformations introduced by digital technologies, focusing on the co-evolution among man, the environment, and technology. Starting from the premise that cognition emerges from the dynamic interaction between biological agents and technical artefacts, the research investigates how technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence, affect learning. The aim is to challenge the isolationist vision of the mind and to propose a reading of learning as a distributed and embodied process that transcends traditional models of information transmission. The survey is based on a systematic review of the literature indexed in Scopus and on an empirical survey conducted through a questionnaire administered to students from different European universities. The results highlight widespread acceptance of technologies as cognitive mediators, but also raise concerns about standardisation and the loss of agency, underscoring the need for a conscious, regulated pedagogical orientation. The conclusions suggest that higher education needs to design ecologically extended learning environments that integrate smart technologies, inclusive methodologies such as flipped learning, and UDL design principles. This approach implies a pedagogy that recognises the tensions between technological substrates and teaching practices, creating spaces in which learning is embodied and co-evolves with socio-technical networks.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content anal-ysis of peer reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56.

Asteria, D., Jap, J. J. K., & Utari, D. (2020). A gender-responsive approach: Social innovation for the sus-tainable smart city in Indonesia and beyond. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 21(6), 196–210.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. In-ternational Society for Technology in Education. ISTE

Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sens du mouvement. Odile Jacob.

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Sie-mens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Buhl, M., & Skov, K. (2020). TechArt learning practices for 1st to 3rd grade in Danish schools. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL 2020), 73–79.

Burcă-Voicu, M. I., Cramarenco, R. E., & Dabija, D.-C. (2025). Navigating the social media market: AI and the challenge of fake news dissemination in the business environment. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(1), 79–124.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. CAST.

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. CAST.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Freire, P. (2002). La pedagogia degli oppressi (L. Bimbi, Ed.; 1ª ed. orig. 1970). EGA.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Gomez Paloma, F., Ascione, A., & Tafuri, D. (2016). Embodied cognition: Il ruolo del corpo nella didattica. Formazione & Insegnamento, 14(1), 75-87.

Gómez Paniagua, A., Ardanuy, M., Valcárcel, M. A., & Izquierdo, J. (2024). An exploration of gender dif-ferences in EFL learners’ self-efficacy, online language learning experience, and enjoyment using Web 2.0 tools and synchronous online flipped learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(4), 1120–1147.

Hailemichael, A. A., & Tamiru, D. (2023). Gender differences in behavioural intention to adopt smart city technologies in developing countries: A cross-national analysis. International Review of Economics, 70(4), 577–607.

Iannella, A., Labruna, T., Santercole, L., & Viti, B. (2021). Reclaiming conversation: Introducing a novel approach to using conversational AI at school (pp. 119–152).

Kopcha, T. J., & Ocak, C. (2024). Embodied learning in the schools: Designs that link brain, body, and technology in K–12 classrooms. Routledge.

La Manna, N., Zappalà, E., & Sibilio, M. (2024). Multimodalità e corporeità negli ambienti di apprendi-mento virtuali: Suggestioni per una didattica inclusiva. Pedagogia delle differenze – Bollettino del-la Fondazione «Vito Fazio-Allmayer», 53(1), 1–18.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Liu, J., & Wang, X. (2020). AI-enabled classroom teaching: The factors, functions and models. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Big Data & Artificial Intelligence & Software Engineering (ICBASE 2020), 117–120.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “It’s dude culture”: Students with mi-noritised identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 340–352.

Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Lena-Acebo, F. J. (2021). Digital gender gap and digital competence among university students. Aula Abierta, 50(1), 505–514.

Retelj, A. (2022). Development of digital competence of future teachers of German as a foreign language at the University of Ljubljana. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, 13(41), 139–161.

Rivoltella, P. C. (2024). Neurodidattica: Insegnare al cervello che apprende (2a ed.). Raffaello Cortina.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Shamigulova, O. A., & Vasilina, D. S. (2023). Formation of media competence at higher educational insti-tutions: Analysis of students-future teachers’ opinions. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 63(3), 50–70.

Sibilio, M. (2002). Il corpo intelligente. Simone.

Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier.

Steffen, A., Dodiya, J., Heinisch, C., Hess, C., Kunz, S., Rebholz, S., Schlömer, I. F., Vaas, S., & Rippich, K. (2023). An exploration of critical incidents impacting female students’ attitude towards STEM sub-jects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Gender Research (ICGR 2023), 215–223.

Stiegler, B. (2008). Prendre soin. De la jeunesse et des générations. Flammarion

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human expe-rience. MIT Press.

Walczak, R., Koszewski, K., Ejsmont, K., & Olszewski, R. (2025). Gender perceptions of IoT technologies in smart cities. Smart Cities, 8(2), Article 60.

Wei, J., Li, W., Zhou, S., Zhang, Y., Tong, T., Peng, D., & Ma, Y. H. (2025). Innovative digital technology in education about Paleolithic sites: A case study of the Peking Man Site at Zhoukoudian. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (ISPRS Ar-chives), 48(M-9-2025), 1599–1606.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2026-03-29

Come citare

Barone, S. L. (2026). Ecologies of knowledge and the drifts of learning: a pedagogical reading between organism, technique and insti-tution. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 6(1). Recuperato da https://www.inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/513

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli