Primum non nocere: Toward a phenomenological understanding of the pedagogical implications of first- and third-order technologies

Autori

  • Christian Gardoni università europea di roma
  • Edorardo Renzi Università di Perugia

Parole chiave:

Pedagogy, Technological Order, Governamentality, Algorithm, Error

Abstract

In the contemporary landscape, we witness and debate the adoption of digital technological devices by children and adolescents, both in schools and private settings. The provision of these tools by parents and teachers, while fearful, is often automatic, transforming digital technologies into educational and domestic environments. Even in the educational context, the debate turns into critical examinations regarding their optimal use to promote learning. This paper, therefore, aims to trace the differences and implications between first-order analog technologies and modern third-order technologies, within the framework of embodied education and cognition. Drawing on interdisciplinary frameworks, including the studies of Floridi (In-betweenness), the paper explores the underlying pedagogical reflections. Specifically, the proposal invites us to think of these new technologies as mind-environment, which, at phenomenological and experiential level, recode spaces, perceptions, and self-control. Finally, it proposes new pedagogical challenges, analyzing the possible shift from “error is master” to “error is the master (algorithm)” and the possible repercussions on the teacher's care and supervision of students.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), pp. 21-32.

Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing self-explanation and scaffolding explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, pp. 33-49.

Edmondson, A. C. (2024). Il giusto errore: La scienza del fallire bene. Milano: EGEA.

Grande Dizionario della lingua Italiana (2026), Errare, in: https://www.gdli.it/pdf_viewer/Scripts/pdf.js/web/viewer.asp?file=/PDF/GDLI05/GDLI_05_ocr_268.pdf&parola=errare

Kollmer, T., & Eckhardt, A. (2023). Dark patterns. Business & information systems engineering, 65(2), 201-208.

Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21.

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole: Technique et langage. Albin Michel.

Livingstone, S., Pothong, K., Atabey, A., Hooper, L., & Day, E. (2024). The Googlization of the classroom: Is the UK effective in protecting children's data and rights?. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100195.

McArthur, B. A., Volkova, V., Tomopoulos, S., & Madigan, S. (2022). Global prevalence of meeting screen time guidelines among children 5 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics, 176(4), 373-383.

Matthes, J., Thomas, M. F., Stevic, A., & Schmuck, D. (2021). Fighting over smartphones? Parents' excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children's use, and conflict. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106618.

Moldon, L., Strohmaier, M., & Wachs, J. (2021). How gamification affects software developers: Cautionary evi-dence from a natural experiment on github, in 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), 549-561

Morin, E., & Corbani, M. (1993). Introduzione al pensiero complesso. Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.

Narciss, S. & Alemdag, E. (2025). Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice. Br J Educ Psychol. 95(1), pp. 197-218.

Nuvoli, V., Camanni, M., Mariani, I., Ponte, S., Black, M., & Lazzerini, M. (2025). Digital screen exposure in infants, children and adolescents: a systematic review of existing recommendations. Public Health in Practice, 100653.

Ponzo, K. (2025). Errore e verità: un rapporto dialettico. Sollecitazioni foucaultiane. InCircolo, 18, pp. 105-123

Prensky, M. (2013). La mente aumentata: dai nativi digitali alla saggezza digitale. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson.

Rosati, A., Renzi, E. & Ponzo, K. (2024). Critical Thinking and Transilience: Possible Answers to Invisible Poverty. Journal of Digital Media & Interaction, 7(17), pp. 127-140. https://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v7i17.38026

Rouvroy, A. (2016). Algorithmic governmentality: Radicalisation and immune strategy of capitalism and neolib-eralism?. La deleuziana, 3(1), 30-36.

Rouvroy, A. & Berns, T. (2013). Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d'émancipation. Réseaux, 177(1), 163-196.

Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford university press.

Zagal, J. P., Björk, S., & Lewis, C. (2013). Dark patterns in the design of games. Foundations of Digital Games, in https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-24252

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2026-03-29

Come citare

Gardoni, C., & Renzi, E. (2026). Primum non nocere: Toward a phenomenological understanding of the pedagogical implications of first- and third-order technologies. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 6(1). Recuperato da https://www.inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/528

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli