Embodied Education and Artificial Intelligence: an integrated pedagogical model for the design of hybrid, inclusive and reflective learning environments in secondary schools
Parole chiave:
Embodied Education, artificial intelligence, engagement, educational inclusion, hybrid learning environmentsAbstract
This study analyses the integration of the embodied approach and artificial intelligence in educational contexts, investigating their effects on engagement, intrinsic motivation and school inclusion. The research, conducted at two upper secondary schools in the city of Naples, involved 180 students divided into an experimental group and a control group according to a quasi-experimental design. The experimental group took part in an 8-week educational intervention based on embodied activities, collaborative practices and guided use of generative artificial intelligence tools, whilst the control group followed traditional teaching activities. The study adopted a mixed-methods approach, integrating the Student Engagement Scale (SES), the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. The results highlight a significant increase in engagement and intrinsic motivation within the experimental group, with preliminary positive indications also regarding the participation of students with special educational needs. The qualitative analysis further shows that AI-supported embodied activities fostered active participation, collaboration, multimodal accessibility and metacognitive reflection. Overall, the study suggests that the integration of embodied education and artificial intelligence, when supported by intentional pedagogical design, can contribute to the creation of more inclusive, reflective and participatory learning environments.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for grounding cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31.
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational theory, 70(1), 89-104.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 50.
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British journal of educational technology, 50(3), 1035-1048.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE access, 8, 75264-75278.
Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291-307.
Florian, L. (2017). Teacher education for the changing demographics of schooling: Inclusive education for each and every learner. In Teacher education for the changing demographics of schooling: Issues for research and practice (pp. 9-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and machines, 28(4), 689-707.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and instruction, 43, 1-4.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford university press.
Heersmink, R. (2016). The internet, cognitive enhancement, and the values of cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 389-407.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. WW Norton & Company.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. R. (2025). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional, and what this means for education. In Social and emotional learning (pp. 63-83). Routledge.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2024). How learning happens: Seminal works in educational psychology and what they mean in practice. Routledge.
Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9, 237.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020, April). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16).
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570.
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). AI and education: A guidance for policymakers. Unesco Publishing.
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational psychology review, 33(3), 937-958.
Ou, C. (2024). Designing socially dynamic digital learning: Technologies and strategies for student engagement. Routledge.
Race, R., & Vidal-Hall, C. (2019). The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research–Volumes 1 and 2.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & education, 147, 103778.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 39.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Davide Di Palma
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
