Teachers, Artificial Intelligence, and Special Educational Needs: Knowledge, Practices, and Operational Awareness in the Italian School System

Autori

  • Marika Lamacchia Università degli Studi di Macerata
  • Francesco Facciorusso Università degli Studi di Macerata
  • Maria Concetta Carruba Università telematica Pegaso

Parole chiave:

Artificial Intelligence in Education; Teacher professional development; Inclusive practices; AI Literacy; Special Educational Needs.

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational contexts requires teachers to move beyond technical proficiency toward reflective and inclusive practices. This study investigates Italian teachers’ knowledge, practices, and operational awareness of AI-based tools, with particular attention to their application for students with special educational needs (SEN). A mixed-method design was adopted, combining a questionnaire administered to 160 teachers with open-ended responses analyzed thematically. Quantitative analyses (ANOVA, MCA, cluster analysis, and ordinal logistic regression) were conducted using Jamovi, while qualitative data were coded with Taguette and supported by lexical analysis in Voyant Tools. Results highlight significant differences in AI Literacy across school levels: secondary teachers and those in support roles display higher reflective and adaptive use of AI. Four teacher profiles emerged, ranging from functional to reflective-experimental. Thematic analysis confirmed a predominance of functional familiarity and disciplinary use, alongside increasing attention to personalization and accessibility. Overall, findings indicate that Italian teachers are in a transition phase toward reflective and inclusive AI integration, emphasizing the need for structured training that transforms technical competence into pedagogical and ethical awareness. 

 

 

Riferimenti bibliografici

Bekiaridis, G., & Attwell, G. (2024). Extending DigCompEdu for AI literacy in educational practice. European Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 234–251.

Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers' professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468.

Crompton, H., & Song, D. (2024). The potential of artificial intelligence in education: Promises and challenges. Routledge.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

Fiorucci, A., & Bevilacqua, G. (2024). AI e inclusione scolastica: Opportunità e rischi nell’educazione speciale italiana. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica, 19(1), 45–62.

Isidori, M. V., Muccini, F., & Evangelista, A. (2024). Education and training for sustainability. Towards Artificial Intelligence: An exploratory investigation on teachers. Education and Training for Ecological Transition: Competences and Professionals for Sustainability, 24(1), 294–300.

Karatas, K., & Yüce, E. (2024). AI and the future of teaching: Preservice teachers’ reflections on the use of artificial intelligence in open and distributed learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 304–325.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

Lamacchia, M., Di Cataldo, M. C., & Carruba, M. C. (2024). Intelligenza artificiale per l’inclusione: Le percezioni dei docenti. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 13(1), 82–95.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Lintner, C. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9(1), 50.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

MIUR. (2015). Piano Nazionale Scuola Digitale. Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca.

Nirchi, S., Mangione, G. R. J., De Vincenzo, C., & Pettenati, M. C. (2025). Indagine esplorativa sulla percezione dei docenti neoassunti circa l’impiego dell’intelligenza artificiale nella didattica: Punti di forza, ostacoli e prospettive. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 30, 151–180.

Raza, A. (2024). Personalizing learning through AI: Opportunities and challenges for inclusive education. AI Edify Journal, 2(1).

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.

Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077.

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440.

The jamovi project. (2024). jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Rampin, R., Rampin, V., & Chávez Ewald, D. (2023). Taguette (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. https://www.taguette.org

Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant Tools [Web-based text analysis software]. https://voyant-tools.org

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2024). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 39.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2025-11-21

Come citare

Lamacchia, M., Facciorusso, F., & Carruba, M. C. (2025). Teachers, Artificial Intelligence, and Special Educational Needs: Knowledge, Practices, and Operational Awareness in the Italian School System. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 5(3). Recuperato da https://www.inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/421