Between Gesture and Interface: A Cyclical Model for Attention in Digital Ecologies
Parole chiave:
ecologia attentiva; ambienti digitali; sostenibilità cognitiva.Abstract
Digital learning environments reshape how learners perceive, act, and sustain attention across networks of bodies, gestures, interfaces, and material configurations. While online formats expand access, they also reveal persistent difficulties in maintaining attention where cognitive demands, technological affordances, and embodied rhythms misalign. This contribution proposes a conceptual framework grounded in cognitive neuroscience, multimedia learning, and ecological–embodied cognition, conceiving attention as a distributed property of human–technology systems rather than an internal resource. The framework informs a cyclic model linking digital environments, attentional challenges, evidence-based strategies, and cognitive outcomes. To operationalize the model, a pilot MOOC will be developed as a testbed for attentional scaffolding, integrating segmented micro-lessons, structured pauses, micro-feedback, lightweight gamification, and guidance on managing the physical study setting. Its effectiveness will be examined through behavioural traces, brief questionnaires, performance measures, and qualitative feedback. The goal is to refine design principles for cognitively sustainable and ecologically grounded digital learning.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). La misurazione dei processi di regolazione cognitiva e metacognitiva durante lo studio con gli ipermedia. TD – Tecnologie Didattiche, 49, 4–12.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2
Bonaiuti, G. (2013). Tecnologie educative: Criteri e modelli per l’integrazione. Carocci.
CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.0. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
D’Elia, P. (2024). Potenziare l’apprendimento autoregolato nell’era digitale: Ricerche e prospettive future. n-Mind Italia, 26. http://it.in-mind.org
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
De Vincenzo, C. (2021). Promoting self-regulated learning to reduce educational inequalities. Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Giannetti, T. (2006). Autoregolazione dell’apprendimento e tecnologie didattiche. CNR – Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Kosmas, P., & Zaphiris, P. (2018). Embodied cognition and its implications in education: An overview of recent literature. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 12(7), 933–938.
Macedo, H. dos S., Santos, I. T. F. dos, & Silva, E. L. O. da. (2023). The power of attention: Bridging cognitive load, multimedia learning, and AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.06586
Macrine, S. L., & Fugate, J. M. B. (2022). Learning with the body: Embodied cognition for education. Commentary in Cognitive Science, 3, 1–6.
Marconato, G. (Ed.). (2013). Ambienti di apprendimento per la formazione continua: Materiali di lavoro del progetto FSE “Modelli organizzativi e didattici per il LLL”. Regione Veneto.
Marzano, A., Vegliante, R., & Iannotta, I. S. (2015). Apprendimento in digitale e processi cognitivi. Formazione & Insegnamento, 13(3), 45–58.
Marzano, A., Vegliante, R., & Iannotta, I. S. (2022). Apprendimento in digitale e processi cognitivi: Problemi aperti e riflessioni da riavviare. Formazione & Insegnamento, 20(3), 45–58.
Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2009). The role of the theory-of-mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Neuropsychologia, 47(8–9), 1649–1657.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2013). Learning and instruction. Pearson.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 87–98.
McCalla, G. (2004). The ecological approach to the design of e-learning environments. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(7).10.5334/2004-7-mccalla
Norman, D. A. (1997). The design of everyday things. MIT Press.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
Pinna, S. (2013). Cognizione estesa. FrancoAngeli.
Pinna, S. (2019). Cognizione estesa e capacità di calcolo. Università di Cagliari.
Renninger, K. A., Ren, Y., & Kern, H. M. (2018). Motivation, engagement, and interest. In International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 116–126). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572-12
Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
Scarinci, A., Di Furia, M., & Peconio, G. (2023). Innovative digital learning environments: New paradigms. FrancoAngeli.
Sullivan, J. V. (2018). Learning and embodied cognition: A review and proposal. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717752550
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Marika Lamacchia, Maria Concetta Carruba, Paola Alessia Lampugnani, Marilena di Padova, Francesco Facciorusso, Anna Dipace
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
