Between green imagination and ecological awareness: environmental identity and teachers’ beliefs in pre-service education
Parole chiave:
environmental identity; environmental education; pre-service teacher educationAbstract
This study examines environmental identity among pre-service teachers, focusing on the relationship between affective connection with nature, attitudes toward environmental protection, and the representational frameworks through which nature is imagined. Situated within the fields of educational research and environmental education, the study addresses a relevant gap by approaching environmental identity not only as a measurable disposition, but also as a meaning-making process shaped during initial teacher education. A quantitative descriptive–correlational design was integrated with a qualitative free-association task. Data were collected from 83 pre-service teachers enrolled in a teacher education program using the Revised Environmental Identity Scale (EID-R) and an open-ended prompt inviting participants to report immediate associations with the concept of nature. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, correlations, and exploratory factor analysis, while qualitative responses were examined through inductive thematic content analysis. Results indicate moderately high levels of both connection with nature and attitudes toward environmental protection, with no statistically significant differences across school contexts. However, qualitative findings show that these orientations are predominantly supported by aesthetic and naturalistic representations of nature, with limited reference to human agency or socio-ecological interdependence. Overall, the study highlights the value of combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to better understand the structure and development of environmental identity in pre-service teacher education.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Almeida, W., et al. (2018). Teacher identities as key to environmental education for sustainability. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education.
Amézquita-Galindo, S. L., & Losada Salgado, N. (2025). Assessment of teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in environmental education in a medium-sized Colombian city. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(9), Article em2690. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16768
Ariccio, S., & Mosca, O. (2023). Revised environmental identity scale: Adaptation and preliminary examination on a sample of Italian pet owners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 892841.
Banzato, M., & Coin, F. (2025). Ideologie e ricerca in educazione ambientale: credenze, approcci e paradigmi. SIREM – Studi Italiani di Ricerca in Educazione Mediale, 15(1), 133–150. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Bonnett, M. (2022). Sustainability and human well-being: An introduction to environmental philosophy and education. Routledge.
Borg, M. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
Clayton, S. (2021). Environmental identity: A measure and its relationship with environmental behaviors. Journal of En-vironmental Psychology, 74, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581
Clayton, S., & Mannetti, L. (2020). Environmental identity and behavior. In R. Gifford (Ed.), Environmental psy-chology: Principles and practice (6th ed.). Optimal Books.
Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500038644
Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
MIUR. (2018). Indicazioni nazionali e nuovi scenari (Nota n. 3645/2018). Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca.
MIM. (2020). Linee guida per l’insegnamento dell’Educazione civica (D.M. 35/2020, attuazione L. 92/2019). Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.
MIM. (2021). RiGenerazione Scuola: Piano per la transizione ecologica e culturale della scuola. Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito. https://rigenerazionescuola.it
Moreno, C., et al. (2022). School in and linked to rural territory: Teaching practices in small rural schools. Australasian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32(2), 23–40.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
Olivos, P., & Clayton, S. (2017). Self, nature, and well-being: Sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00450
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Panizza, S. (2020). Le Linee guida ministeriali per l’insegnamento dell’educazione civica. Diritti Fondamentali, 1–14.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Sierra-Barón, W., Olivos-Jara, P., Gómez-Acosta, A., & Navarro, O. (2023). Environmental identity, connectedness with nature, and well-being as predictors of pro-environmental behavior and their comparison between inhabitants of rural and urban areas. Sustainability, 15(5), 4525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054525
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap. UNESCO.
Wals, A. E. J. (2015). Beyond unreasonable doubt: Education and the questioning of sustainability. Wageningen University.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Francesca Finestrone

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.