Embodied inquiry with AI as facilitator: an exploratory case study
Parole chiave:
embodied learning; inquiry-based learning; artificial intelligence; physics education; Universal Design for LearningAbstract
Generative AI is entering science education at a time when the embodied education community is asking what such systems cannot do. Rather than asking whether AI can understand the body, this exploratory case study asks where a language-based AI can stand within an inquiry activity without displacing embodied experience. University students in a Master's course in physics education investigated the statics of fluids following the ISLE approach (Investigative Science Learning Environment) in a two-phase design: students first built the buoyancy model with their own hands, without AI; a purpose-configured AI assistant then facilitated the application of the model to a new phenomenon. We discuss what a language-based facilitator cannot reach and the value of a design in which AI complements embodied inquiry rather than replacing it.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 27–49.
Brookes, D. T., Etkina, E., & Planinšič, G. (2020). Implementing an epistemologically authentic approach to student-centered inquiry learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020148.
CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.
Damiani, P., Cuccaro, A., Gentilozzi, C., & Gomez Paloma, F. (2025). A grammar of embodied education: Ten inspiring principles. Embodied Education Journal, 1(1).
Damiani P, Gomez Paloma F (2018). Educational ECS. Un approccio “embodied cognitive” per le scuole. Giornale Italiano Della Ricerca Educativa, vol. Anno XI n. 21, p. 73-82.
Etkina, E., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). Investigative Science Learning Environment: A science process approach to learning physics. In E. F. Redish & P. J. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based reform of university physics. American Association of Physics Teachers.
Fiorucci, A. (2025). Universal Design for Learning as a driver of inclusive transformation in Higher Education: toward New Cultures of Difference. Pensa Multimedia, pp. 23-42.
Gomez Paloma F., Damiani P. (2021). L’Embodiment in Educazione: un collante scientifico tra complessità, semplessità e trasformatività. Nuova Secondaria, vol. 10, pp. 270-282.
Gregorcic, B. (2024). Students’ embodied interactions during collaborative learning activities in physics. In S. Faletič & J. Pavlin (Eds.), Teaching and learning physics effectively in challenging times. Springer.
Gregorcic, B., & Pendrill, A.-M. (2023). ChatGPT and the frustrated Socrates. Physics Education, 58(3), 035021.
Gregorcic, B., Planinšič, G., & Etkina, E. (2017). Doing science by waving hands: Talk, symbiotic gesture, and interaction with digital content as resources in student inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020104.
Gregorcic, B., Polverini, G., & Sarlah, B. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for honing teachers’ Socratic dialogue skills. Physics Education, 59(4), 045005.
Kersting, M., Amin, T. G., Euler, E., Gregorcic, B., Haglund, J., Kondrup Hardahl, L., & Steier, R. (2024). What is the role of the body in science education? A conversation between traditions. Science & Education, 33, 1171–1210.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kortemeyer, G. (2026). The boiling-frog problem of physics education. The Physics Teacher, 64(1), 8–12.
Samuelsson, C. R., Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2025). Embodied AI? Exploring GenAI’s role in physics lab design [Poster presentation]. ESERA 2025 Conference.
Shapiro, L., Stolz, S.A. (2019). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education 2019, Vol. 17(1) 19-39.
Tufino, E. (2024) Un approccio inquiry sistematico e integrato per apprendere la fisica, Giornale di Fisica LXV(2)
Tufino,E., Gregorcic B., (2025) Creating a customisable Socratic AI physics tutor, Physics Education 60 (2025) 065037.
Van Heuvelen, A., & Zou, X. (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 184–194.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Eugenio Tufino, Paola Damiani
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
