The Reflexive Teacher and the Semiotics of Learning: An Umwelt-Based Account of Didactic Transposition
Parole chiave:
Teacher reflexivity; Didactic transposition; AI Education; Embodied-EducationAbstract
This article reconceptualizes didactic transposition as a semiotics of learning grounded in Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of Umwelt and in teacher reflexivity as a core pedagogical competence. Moving beyond traditional views of transposition as content simplification or sequencing, the paper argues that learning is a biosemiotic, situated, and co-constructive process in which learners integrate new knowledge into subjective, meaning-laden worlds shaped by embodied, cultural, linguistic, and technological experiences. From this perspective, teaching is understood as semiotic mediation: an interpretative practice through which teachers design, orchestrate, and regulate semiotic pathways that enable disciplinary knowledge to become intelligible and meaningful across plural Umwelten. Particular attention is given to the role of digital technologies and artificial intelligence, which increasingly extend learners’ semiotic environments by introducing adaptive feedback, multimodal representations, and generative outputs. While these tools expand educational affordances, their pedagogical value depends on reflexive teacher mediation capable of aligning technological signs with curricular goals, cultural frameworks, and ethical considerations. The article positions teacher reflexivity as both an epistemic and professional competence that supports inclusion, interpretive flexibility, and culturally sustaining pedagogy in heterogeneous classrooms. By integrating biosemiotic theory, semiotics of learning, and contemporary educational technology, the paper offers a theoretical framework and practical implications for curriculum design, assessment, and teacher education in complex, AI-augmented learning ecologies.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aiello, P., D'Elia, F., Di Tore, S., & Sibilio, M. (2012). A constructivist approach to virtual reality for experiential learning. E-learning and Digital Media, 9(3), 317-324.
Aiello, P., & Sibilio, M. (2012). The potentials of bodily experience in the construction of knowledge:" bodily-dynamic concept maps" as teaching-learning proposal for" meaningful learning". Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(3), 284.
Aiello, P., Di Tore, S., Di Tore, P. A., & Sibilio, M. (2013). Didactics and simplexity: Umwelt as a perceptive inter-face. Education Sciences & Society: 1, 2013, 27-35.
Aiello, P. (2019). Teacher Education e Induction Period. Agentività del docente e sostenibilità di modelli forma-tivi. Nuova Secondaria, 58-61.
Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.
Bagni, G. T., & D’Amore, B. (2005). Epistemologia, sociologia, semiotica: la prospettiva socio-culturale. La matematica e la sua didattica, 19(1), 73-89.
Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective practice, 16(1), 123-141.
Bjelde, J. (2021). Knowledge is teachable. Mind, 130(518), 475-502.
Pace, E. M. (2025). DEFINING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHER PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY DE-VELOPMENT: A THEORETICAL REFLECTION. In ICERI2025 Proceedings(pp. 4784-4790). IATED.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Winsløw, C., Bosch, M., González-Martín, A. S., & Huo, R. (2024). Technology in university mathematics education. In Handbook of digital resources in mathematics education (pp. 823-849). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Campbell, C., Olteanu, A., & Kull, K. (2019). Learning and knowing as semiosis: Extending the conceptual apparatus of semiotics. Sign systems studies., 47(3-4), 352-381.
Deni, M., & Zingale, S. (2018). Semiotica e didattica del design. La didattica del design in Italia, 96-107.
Di Gennaro, D. C., Pace, E. M., Zollo, I., & Aiello, P. (2014). TEACHER CAPACITY BUILDING THROUGH CRITICAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICE FOR THE PROMOTION OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 60.
Di Tore, S., Aiello, P., Sibilio, M., & Berthoz, A. (2020). Simplex didactics: promoting transversal learning through the training of perspective taking. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 34-49.
Gensini, S. (2016). IL PROBLEMA SEMIOTICO DEL TESTO FRA RICERCA E DIDATTICA di. La centralità del testo nelle pratiche didattiche, 52.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and brain sciences, 40, e46.
Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2025). How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(2), 345-359.
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 11(2), 73-92.
Chandler, D. (2022). Semiotics: the basics. Routledge.
Chevallard, Y., & Johsua, M. A. (1985). La transposition didactique: du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. La Pensée Sauvage,.
Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT press.
Ciccarelli, S., & Tafuri, M. G. (2024). Embodied digital learning: New educational scenarios between artificial intel-ligence and the rediscovery of corporeality. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(1).
Deely, J., & Semetsky, I. (2017). Semiotics, edusemiotics and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy and The-ory, 49(3), 207-219.
Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2022). Enactive ethics: Difference becoming participation. Topoi, 41(2), 241-256.
Di Paolo, A., Sessa, C., & Sibilio, M. (2024). From game to videogame: the didactic design between real and virtual game in an inclusive and simplexity way. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(3).
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. DC Heath & Co. Boston, Mass, 224.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Macmillan+ ORM.
Fenwick, T. J., & Edwards, R. (Eds.). (2019). Revisiting actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education?. European journal of special needs education, 29(3), 286-294.
Frauenfelder, E. (2004). Introduzione alle scienze bioeducative.
Frauenfelder, E. (2011). Una dinamica dialogica per la nascita delle Scienze bioeducative. Studi Sulla Formazione/Open Journal of Education, 14(1), 7-17.
Frauenfelder, E., Rivoltella, P. C., Rossi, P. G., & Sibilio, M. (2013). Bio-education, simplexity, neuroscience and en-activism: a new paradigm?. Education Sciences & Society: 1, 2013, 11-25.
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative health re-search, 12(4), 531-545.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.
Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470-497.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
Kruis, J. (2014). Expanding Umwelt Theory: From Structural Linguistics to Cognitive Learning. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 10(3), 497-507.
Kull, K., & Velmezova, E. (2024). Semiotics now. Sign Systems Studies, 52(3-4), 543-593.
Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
Mariotti, M. A., & Maffia, A. (2018). Dall’utilizzo degli artefatti ai significati matematici: il ruolo dell’insegnante nel processo di mediazione semiotica. Didattica della matematica. Dalla ricerca alle pratiche d’aula, (4), 50-64.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 422.
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
Perrenoud, P. (1998). La transposition didactique à partir de pratiques: des savoirs aux compétences. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 24 (3), pp. 487‐514.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qual-itative research. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 16(2), 175-196.
Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Henry, L. (1996). Working memory in children with autism and with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 37(6), 673-686.
Sadler, D. R. (2013). Making competent judgments of competence. In Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education: Tasks and challenges (pp. 13-27). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Schiavo, F., Mangione, G. R. J., Di Domenico, M., & Di Tore, P. A. (2025). Towards a Somatic Pedagogy of Artificial Intelligence: interdisciplinary reflections between Embodied Cognition and Educational Design. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 5(2).
Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
Sessa, C., & Aiello, P. (2024). CAN MY CO-TEACHER BE A CHATBOT?. In ICERI2024 Proceedings (pp. 8322-8329). IATED.
Sessa, C., & Aiello, P. (2025). ENHANCING REFLECTIVE AND METACOGNITIVE COMPETENCES IN TEACHER EDUCATION FOR THE INCLUSION OF STUDENTS WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS, 9(1).
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Sibilio, M., Di Tore, S., Todino, M. D., Lecce, A., Viola, I., & Campitiello, L. (2023, July). MetaWelt: embodied in which body? Simplex didactics to live the web 3.0. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 111-119). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive education isn’t dead, it just smells funny. Routledge.
Tønnessen, M., Magnus, R., & Brentari, C. (2016). The biosemiotic glossary project: Umwelt. Biosemiotics, 9(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9255-6.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.
Rosch, E., Thompson, E., & Varela, F. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, by Cambridge.
Todino, M. D., Aiello, P., & Sibilio, M. (2016). Flexible classrooms for inclusive education. In ICERI2016 Proceedings (pp. 1674-1678). IATED.
Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70-86.
Kull, K. (2022). Gatherings in Biosemiotics 2022, Book of Abstracts (Umwelt analysis, etc.). Gatherings in Biosemiotics 2022.
Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (2013). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.
Zhou, D., Xue, X., Lu, X., Guo, Y., Ji, P., Lv, H., ... & Cui, L. (2024). A hierarchical model for complex adaptive system: From adaptive agent to ai society. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems.
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2024). Generative AI in STEM education: Opportunities for scaffolded semiotic learning. Computers & Education, 202, 104837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104837
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Carmine Sessa, Paola Aiello

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.